TEXT 67

Tekst

Text

idaṁ te nātapaskāya
nābhaktāya kadācana
na cāśuśrūṣave vācyaṁ
na ca māṁ yo ’bhyasūyati

Synonyms

idam — seda; te — sinu poolt; na — mitte kunagi; atapaskāya — sellele, kes ei soorita askeese; na — mitte kunagi; abhaktāya — sellele, kes pole pühendunu; kadācana — ükskõik, millal; na — mitte kunagi; ca — samuti; aśuśrūṣave — sellele, kes ei ole rakendanud end pühendunud teenimisse; vācyam — rääkida; na — mitte kunagi; ca — samuti; mām — Minu suhtes; yaḥ — igaüks, kes; abhyasūyati — on kade.

idam — this; te — by you; na — never; atapaskāya — to one who is not austere; na — never; abhaktāya — to one who is not a devotee; kadācana — at any time; na — never; ca — also; aśuśrūṣave — to one who is not engaged in devotional service; vācyam — to be spoken; na — never; ca — also; mām — toward Me; yaḥ — anyone who; abhyasūyati — is envious.

Translation

Neid salajasi teadmisi ei tohi kunagi selgitada neile, kes ei soorita askeese ega pühendunud teenimist ega ole pühendunud, ega ka mitte neile, kes Mind kadestavad.

This confidential knowledge may never be explained to those who are not austere, or devoted, or engaged in devotional service, nor to one who is envious of Me.

Purport

Neid kõige salajasemaid teadmisi ei tohi jagada neile, kes ei ole läbi teinud religioosseid askeese, kes pole kunagi üritanud teenida Jumalat pühendunult ning Kṛṣṇa teadvuses, ning eriti neile, kes pole teeninud puhast pühendunut. Kindlasti mitte ka neile, kes peavad Kṛṣṇat üksnes üheks ajalooliseks isiksuseks või neile, kes kadestavad Tema võimsust. Siiski võime me vahel näha, et isegi Kṛṣṇat kadestavad deemonlikud inimesed teenivad Kṛṣṇat väärastunud moel, võttes „Bhagavad-gītā" selgitamise endale elukutseks ning selgitades seda nii nagu neile meeldib, teenides sellega raha. Kuid igaüks, kes soovib tõesti Kṛṣṇat mõista, peab selliseid „Bhagavad-gītā" kommentaare vältima. Meelelisi naudinguid ihaldav inimene „Bhagavad- gītā" tegelikku tähendust mõista ei suuda. Isegi kui inimene ei ihalda meelelisi naudinguid ning järgib vedalikes pühakirjades antud juhendusi, ei suuda ta mõista Kṛṣṇat, kui ta ei ole Tema pühendunu. Ning isegi siis, kui ta esitab end Kṛṣṇa pühendununa, kuid ei ole tegelikult hõivatud tegevustega Kṛṣṇa teadvuses, ei suuda ta Kṛṣṇat mõista. Kṛṣṇat kadestavad paljud, kuna Ta kinnitas „Bhagavad-gītās", et Ta on Kõigekõrgem ning seetõttu pole ka kedagi, kes oleks Temaga võrdne või Temast võimsam. Kṛṣṇa peale on paljud kadedad. Sellistele inimestele ei tohiks „Bhagavad-gītāt" jutustada, sest nad ei mõista seda. Pole võimalik, et „Bhagavad-gītāt" ja Kṛṣṇat suudaksid mõista uskmatud. Mõistmata Kṛṣṇat puhta pühendunu autoriteetsusele toetudes, ei tohiks keegi püüda „Bhagavad-gītāt" kommenteerida.

Persons who have not undergone the austerities of the religious process, who have never attempted devotional service in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, who have not tended a pure devotee, and especially those who are conscious of Kṛṣṇa only as a historical personality or who are envious of the greatness of Kṛṣṇa should not be told this most confidential part of knowledge. It is, however, sometimes found that even demoniac persons who are envious of Kṛṣṇa, worshiping Kṛṣṇa in a different way, take to the profession of explaining Bhagavad-gītā in a different way to make business, but anyone who desires actually to understand Kṛṣṇa must avoid such commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā. Actually the purpose of Bhagavad-gītā is not understandable to those who are sensuous. Even if one is not sensuous but is strictly following the disciplines enjoined in the Vedic scripture, if he is not a devotee he also cannot understand Kṛṣṇa. And even when one poses himself as a devotee of Kṛṣṇa but is not engaged in Kṛṣṇa conscious activities, he also cannot understand Kṛṣṇa. There are many persons who envy Kṛṣṇa because He has explained in Bhagavad-gītā that He is the Supreme and that nothing is above Him or equal to Him. There are many persons who are envious of Kṛṣṇa. Such persons should not be told of Bhagavad-gītā, for they cannot understand. There is no possibility of faithless persons’ understanding Bhagavad-gītā and Kṛṣṇa. Without understanding Kṛṣṇa from the authority of a pure devotee, one should not try to comment upon Bhagavad-gītā.