TEXT 51

Tekst

Text

arjuna uvāca
dṛṣṭvedaṁ mānuṣaṁ rūpaṁ
tava saumyaṁ janārdana
idānīm asmi saṁvṛttaḥ
sa-cetāḥ prakṛtiṁ gataḥ

Synonyms

arjunaḥ uvāca — Arjuna ütles; dṛṣṭvā — nähes; idam — seda; mānuṣam — inimlikku; rūpam — kuju; tava — Sinu; saumyam — väga ilusat; janārdana — oo, vaenlaste nuhtleja; idānīm — praegu; asmi — mina olen; saṁvṛttaḥ — rahunenud; sa-cetāḥ — minu teadvuses; prakṛtim — oma enda loomuse juurde; gataḥ — tagasi pöördunud.

arjunaḥ uvāca — Arjuna said; dṛṣṭvā — seeing; idam — this; mānuṣam — human; rūpam — form; tava — Your; saumyam — very beautiful; janārdana — O chastiser of the enemies; idānīm — now; asmi — I am; saṁvṛttaḥ — settled; sa-cetāḥ — in my consciousness; prakṛtim — to my own nature; gataḥ — returned.

Translation

Kui Arjuna nägi Kṛṣṇat Tema algsel kujul, ütles ta: Oo, Janārdana, nähes Sinu ülimalt ilusat inimnäolist keha, on mu mõistus nüüd rahunenud ning mu algne loodus taastunud.

When Arjuna thus saw Kṛṣṇa in His original form, he said: O Janārdana, seeing this humanlike form, so very beautiful, I am now composed in mind, and I am restored to my original nature.

Purport

Sõnad mānuṣaṁ rūpam näitavad siin selgelt, et Jumala Kõrgeima Isiksuse algne kuju on kahekäeline. Käesolevas värsis kinnitatakse, et need, kes pilkavad Kṛṣṇat, pidades Teda tavaliseks inimeseks, ei tunne Tema jumalikku loomust. Kui Kṛṣṇa oleks tavaline inimene, kuidas saaks Ta siis ilmutada End kõiksuse kujul ning seejärel taas neljakäelise Nārāyaṇa kujul? Seega öeldakse „Bhagavad-gītās" väga selgelt, et see, kes peab Kṛṣṇat tavaliseks inimeseks ning kes eksitab teisi lugejaid öeldes, et Kṛṣṇas kõneleb impersonaalne Brahman, teeb suurimat ülekohut. Kṛṣṇa on näidanud Oma kõiksuse kuju ja neljakäelist Viṣṇu kuju. Kuidas saab Ta siis olla tavaline inimene? Puhas pühendunu ei lase end segada eksitavatest „Bhagavad-gītā" kommentaaridest, sest ta teab, mis on mis. „Bhagavad-gītā" algsed värsid on kirkad kui päike, nende nägemiseks pole vaja teadmatute kommenteerijate lambivalgust.

Here the words mānuṣaṁ rūpam clearly indicate the Supreme Personality of Godhead to be originally two-handed. Those who deride Kṛṣṇa as if He were an ordinary person are shown here to be ignorant of His divine nature. If Kṛṣṇa is like an ordinary human being, then how is it possible for Him to show the universal form and again to show the four-handed Nārāyaṇa form? So it is very clearly stated in Bhagavad-gītā that one who thinks that Kṛṣṇa is an ordinary person and who misguides the reader by claiming that it is the impersonal Brahman within Kṛṣṇa speaking is doing the greatest injustice. Kṛṣṇa has actually shown His universal form and His four-handed Viṣṇu form. So how can He be an ordinary human being? A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā because he knows what is what. The original verses of Bhagavad-gītā are as clear as the sun; they do not require lamplight from foolish commentators.