Skip to main content

TEXT 3

TEXT 3

Devanagari

Devanagari

सत्त्वानुरूपा सर्वस्य श्रद्धा भवति भारत ।
श्रद्धामयोऽयं पुरुषो यो यच्छ्रद्ध: स एव स: ॥ ३ ॥

Text

Tekst

sattvānurūpā sarvasya
śraddhā bhavati bhārata
śraddhā-mayo ’yaṁ puruṣo
yo yac-chraddhaḥ sa eva saḥ
sattvānurūpā sarvasya
śraddhā bhavati bhārata
śraddhā-mayo ’yaṁ puruṣo
yo yac-chraddhaḥ sa eva saḥ

Synonyms

Synonyms

sattva-anurūpā — according to the existence; sarvasya — of everyone; śraddhā — faith; bhavati — becomes; bhārata — O son of Bharata; śraddhā — faith; mayaḥ — full of; ayam — this; puruṣaḥ — living entity; yaḥ — who; yat — having which; śraddhaḥ — faith; saḥ — thus; eva — certainly; saḥ — he.

sattva-anurūpā — ifølge eksistensen; sarvasya — alles; śraddhā — tro; bhavati — bliver; bhārata — O Bharatas efterkommer; śraddhā — tro; mayaḥ — fuld af; ayam — dette; puruṣaḥ — levende væsen; yaḥ — den, som; yat — hvilken; śraddhaḥ — hvis tro er; saḥ — den; eva — afgjort; saḥ — han er.

Translation

Translation

O son of Bharata, according to one’s existence under the various modes of nature, one evolves a particular kind of faith. The living being is said to be of a particular faith according to the modes he has acquired.

O Bharatas efterkommer, ifølge sin eksistens under naturens forskellige kvaliteter udvikler man en bestemt slags tro. Det levende væsen siges at være af en bestemt tro i overensstemmelse med de kvaliteter, han har erhvervet sig.

Purport

Purport

Everyone has a particular type of faith, regardless of what he is. But his faith is considered good, passionate or ignorant according to the nature he has acquired. Thus, according to his particular type of faith, one associates with certain persons. Now the real fact is that every living being, as is stated in the Fifteenth Chapter, is originally a fragmental part and parcel of the Supreme Lord. Therefore one is originally transcendental to all the modes of material nature. But when one forgets his relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead and comes into contact with the material nature in conditional life, he generates his own position by association with the different varieties of material nature. The resultant artificial faith and existence are only material. Although one may be conducted by some impression, or some conception of life, originally he is nirguṇa, or transcendental. Therefore one has to become cleansed of the material contamination that he has acquired, in order to regain his relationship with the Supreme Lord. That is the only path back without fear: Kṛṣṇa consciousness. If one is situated in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then that path is guaranteed for his elevation to the perfectional stage. If one does not take to this path of self-realization, then he is surely to be conducted by the influence of the modes of nature.

FORKLARING: Alle har en bestemt form for tro, uanset hvem man er. Men ens tro betragtes som god, lidenskabelig eller uvidende i forhold til den natur, man har erhvervet sig. Således omgås man alt efter sin bestemte slags tro med bestemte personer. Som det blev forklaret i kapitel 15, er hvert eneste levende væsen i virkeligheden oprindeligt en fragmentarisk uadskillelig del af den Højeste Herre. Derfor er man oprindeligt transcendental til alle den materielle naturs kvaliteter. Men når man glemmer sit forhold til Guddommens Højeste Personlighed og i betinget liv kommer i kontakt med den materielle natur, skaber man sin egen eksistentielle situation ved at omgås med den materielle naturs forskellige facetter. Den resulterende kunstige tro og eksistens er kun materiel. Selv om man bliver styret af en bestemt indflydelse eller livsanskuelse, er man oprindeligt nirguṇa eller transcendental. For at genvinde sit forhold til den Højeste Herre skal man derfor renses for den materielle forurening, man har pådraget sig. Det er den eneste sikre vej tilbage: Kṛṣṇa-bevidsthed. Hvis man er situeret i Kṛṣṇa-bevidsthed, ophøjer den vej med garanti én til det perfekte stade. Hvis man ikke følger denne vej til selverkendelse, styres man helt sikkert af den materielle naturs indflydelse.

The word śraddhā, or “faith,” is very significant in this verse. Śraddhā, or faith, originally comes out of the mode of goodness. One’s faith may be in a demigod or some created God or some mental concoction. One’s strong faith is supposed to be productive of works of material goodness. But in material conditional life, no works are completely purified. They are mixed. They are not in pure goodness. Pure goodness is transcendental; in purified goodness one can understand the real nature of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As long as one’s faith is not completely in purified goodness, the faith is subject to contamination by any of the modes of material nature. The contaminated modes of material nature expand to the heart. Therefore according to the position of the heart in contact with a particular mode of material nature, one’s faith is established. It should be understood that if one’s heart is in the mode of goodness his faith is also in the mode of goodness. If his heart is in the mode of passion, his faith is also in the mode of passion. And if his heart is in the mode of darkness, illusion, his faith is also thus contaminated. Thus we find different types of faith in this world, and there are different types of religions due to different types of faith. The real principle of religious faith is situated in the mode of pure goodness, but because the heart is tainted we find different types of religious principles. Thus according to different types of faith, there are different kinds of worship.

I dette vers er ordet śraddhā eller “tro” betydningsfuldt. Śraddhā eller tro udspringer oprindeligt af godhedens kvalitet. Ens tro kan være på en halvgud, en eller anden opdigtet Gud eller på et eller andet mentalt opspind. Det er meningen, at ens stærke tro skal afføde handling i materiel godhed. Men i det materielt betingede liv er ingen handlinger helt rene. De er blandede. De er ikke i ren godhed. Ren godhed er transcendental. I ren godhed kan man forstå den virkelige natur af Guddommens Højeste Personlighed. Så længe ens tro ikke helt er i ren godhed, er troen sårbar over for besmittelse fra en hvilken som helst af den materielle naturs kvaliteter. De besmittede kvaliteter fra den materielle natur spreder sig til hjertet. Derfor bliver ens tro befæstet alt efter den situation, hjertet er i fra sin forbindelse med en af naturens kvaliteter. Det må forstås, at hvis ens hjerte er i godhedens kvalitet, er ens tro også i godhedens kvalitet. Hvis ens hjerte er i lidenskabens kvalitet, er ens tro også i lidenskabens kvalitet. Og hvis ens hjerte er i mørkets kvalitet, i illusion, vil ens tro være tilsvarende forurenet. På denne måde finder vi forskellige former for tro i denne verden, og der er forskellige slags religioner i forhold til forskellige slags tro. Det virkelige princip for religiøs tro er funderet i den rene godheds kvalitet, men fordi hjertet er urent, finder vi forskellige slags religiøse principper. I overensstemmelse med forskellige former for tro findes der således forskellige slags tilbedelse.