Skip to main content

TEXT 1

TEXT 1

Tekst

Text

dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca
dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre
samavetā yuyutsavaḥ
māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva
kim akurvata sañjaya
dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca
dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre
samavetā yuyutsavaḥ
māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva
kim akurvata sañjaya

Synonyms

Synonyms

dhṛtarāṣṭraḥ uvāca — Kong Dhṛtarāṣṭra sagde; dharma-kṣetre — på pilgrimsstedet; kuru-kṣetre — ved navn Kurukṣetra; samavetāḥ — forsamlet; yuyutsavaḥ — med et ønske om at kæmpe; māmakāḥ — min side (mine sønner); pāṇḍavāḥ — Pāṇḍus sønner; ca — og; eva — afgjort; kim — hvad; akurvata — gjorde de; sañjaya — O Sañjaya.

dhṛtarāṣṭraḥ uvāca — King Dhṛtarāṣṭra said; dharma-kṣetre — in the place of pilgrimage; kuru-kṣetre — in the place named Kurukṣetra; samavetāḥ — assembled; yuyutsavaḥ — desiring to fight; māmakāḥ — my party (sons); pāṇḍavāḥ — the sons of Pāṇḍu; ca — and; eva — certainly; kim — what; akurvata — did they do; sañjaya — O Sañjaya.

Translation

Translation

Dhṛtarāṣṭra sagde: O Sañjaya, hvad gjorde mine sønner og Pāṇḍus sønner efter at have taget opstilling på Kurukṣetras pilgrimssted, kamplystne som de var?

Dhṛtarāṣṭra said: O Sañjaya, after my sons and the sons of Pāṇḍu assembled in the place of pilgrimage at Kurukṣetra, desiring to fight, what did they do?

Purport

Purport

FORKLARING: Bhagavad-gītā er den vidt udbredte teistiske videnskab, der er sammenfattet i Gītā-māhātmya (Forherligelse af Bhagavad-gītā). Der står der, at man skal studere Bhagavad-gītā omhyggeligt under vejledning af en person, der er Śrī Kṛṣṇas hengivne, og forsøge at forstå Bhagavad-gītā uden personlige motiver. Bogen giver selv eksemplet på sådan en klar forståelse, nemlig som den blev forstået af Arjuna, der hørte Bhagavad-gītā direkte fra Herren. Hvis man er så heldig at forstå Bhagavad-gītā via discipelrækken uden selviske fortolkninger, overgår man al vedisk visdom og alle hellige skrifter i verden. Bhagavad-gītā indeholder alt, der findes i andre skrifter, men læseren vil også finde ting, der ikke er at finde andre steder. Det er det særlige ved Bhagavad-gītā. Eftersom den bliver talt direkte af selve Guddommens Højeste Personlighed, Herren Śrī Kṛṣṇa, er den perfektionen af enhver form for teistisk videnskab.

Bhagavad-gītā is the widely read theistic science summarized in the Gītā-māhātmya (Glorification of the Gītā). There it says that one should read Bhagavad-gītā very scrutinizingly with the help of a person who is a devotee of Śrī Kṛṣṇa and try to understand it without personally motivated interpretations. The example of clear understanding is there in the Bhagavad-gītā itself, in the way the teaching is understood by Arjuna, who heard the Gītā directly from the Lord. If someone is fortunate enough to understand the Bhagavad-gītā in that line of disciplic succession, without motivated interpretation, then he surpasses all studies of Vedic wisdom, and all scriptures of the world. One will find in the Bhagavad-gītā all that is contained in other scriptures, but the reader will also find things which are not to be found elsewhere. That is the specific standard of the Gītā. It is the perfect theistic science because it is directly spoken by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa.

Som beskrevet i Mahābhārata danner de emner, som Dhṛtarāṣṭra og Sañjaya diskuterer, grundlaget for denne storslåede filosofi. Det fremgår, at denne filosofi blev udviklet på Kurukṣetras slagmark, der har været et helligt pilgrimssted siden tidernes morgen i den vediske tidsalder. Den blev talt af Herren, da Han personligt var på planeten for at vejlede menneskeheden.

The topics discussed by Dhṛtarāṣṭra and Sañjaya, as described in the Mahābhārata, form the basic principle for this great philosophy. It is understood that this philosophy evolved on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra, which is a sacred place of pilgrimage from the immemorial time of the Vedic age. It was spoken by the Lord when He was present personally on this planet for the guidance of mankind.

Ordet dharma-kṣetra (et sted, hvor der foregår religiøse ritualer) er vigtigt, for Guddommens Højeste Personlighed var på Arjunas side på Kurukṣetras slagmark. Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Kuruernes fader, nærede stærke tvivl om muligheden for sine sønners endelige sejr. I sin tvivl spurgte han sin sekretær Sañjaya: “Hvad gjorde de?” Han vidste, at både hans egne sønner og hans yngre bror Pāṇḍus sønner var forsamlet på Kurukṣetra fast besluttet på krig. Hans spørgsmål er alligevel vigtigt. Han ønskede intet kompromis mellem fætrene og brødrene, så han ville gerne forsikre sig om sine sønners skæbne på slagmarken. Fordi slaget skulle udkæmpes på Kurukṣetra, der er omtalt andetsteds i Vedaerne som et helligt sted for selv himmelens beboere, frygtede Dhṛtarāṣṭra det hellige steds eventuelle indflydelse på slagets udfald. Han var godt klar over, at det i så fald ville virke til fordel for Pāṇḍus sønner, der fra naturens side var retskafne. Sañjaya, der var elev af Vyāsa, kunne gennem dennes barmhjertighed se Kurukṣetras slagmark for sit indre syn, selv om han befandt sig i Dhṛtarāṣṭras værelse. Dhṛtarāṣṭra udspurgte ham derfor om situationen på slagmarken.

The word dharma-kṣetra (a place where religious rituals are performed) is significant because, on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra, the Supreme Personality of Godhead was present on the side of Arjuna. Dhṛtarāṣṭra, the father of the Kurus, was highly doubtful about the possibility of his sons’ ultimate victory. In his doubt, he inquired from his secretary Sañjaya, “What did they do?” He was confident that both his sons and the sons of his younger brother Pāṇḍu were assembled in that Field of Kurukṣetra for a determined engagement of the war. Still, his inquiry is significant. He did not want a compromise between the cousins and brothers, and he wanted to be sure of the fate of his sons on the battlefield. Because the battle was arranged to be fought at Kurukṣetra, which is mentioned elsewhere in the Vedas as a place of worship – even for the denizens of heaven – Dhṛtarāṣṭra became very fearful about the influence of the holy place on the outcome of the battle. He knew very well that this would influence Arjuna and the sons of Pāṇḍu favorably, because by nature they were all virtuous. Sañjaya was a student of Vyāsa, and therefore, by the mercy of Vyāsa, Sañjaya was able to envision the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra even while he was in the room of Dhṛtarāṣṭra. And so, Dhṛtarāṣṭra asked him about the situation on the battlefield.

Både Pāṇḍavaerne og Dhṛtarāṣṭras sønner tilhørte samme familie, men Dhṛtarāṣṭras holdning afsløres her. Han henviste med overlæg kun til sine sønner som Kuruer og udelukkede på den måde Pāṇḍus sønner fra familiearven. Man kan således forstå Dhṛtarāṣṭras indstilling til hans nevøer, Pāṇḍus sønner. Ligesom ukrudt bliver luget væk på en rismark, må det forventes lige fra starten af disse hændelser, at på det hellige sted Kurukṣetra, hvor religionens fader, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, var til stede, ville al ukrudt i form af Dhṛtarāṣṭras søn Duryodhana og andre blive udryddet og de helt igennem religiøse personer med Yudhiṣṭhira i spidsen blive genindsat af Herren. Det er betydningen af ordene dharma-kṣetre og kuru-kṣetre ud over deres historiske og vediske betydning.

Both the Pāṇḍavas and the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra belong to the same family, but Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s mind is disclosed herein. He deliberately claimed only his sons as Kurus, and he separated the sons of Pāṇḍu from the family heritage. One can thus understand the specific position of Dhṛtarāṣṭra in his relationship with his nephews, the sons of Pāṇḍu. As in the paddy field the unnecessary plants are taken out, so it is expected from the very beginning of these topics that in the religious field of Kurukṣetra, where the father of religion, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, was present, the unwanted plants like Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s son Duryodhana and others would be wiped out and the thoroughly religious persons, headed by Yudhiṣṭhira, would be established by the Lord. This is the significance of the words dharma-kṣetre and kuru-kṣetre, apart from their historical and Vedic importance.